>[!abstract] >An antinomic [[Paradox|paradox]] arises from apparently sound reasoning leading to a self-contradiction, revealing a fundamental inconsistency within the underlying logical or conceptual system. Unlike [[Veridical paradox|veridical]] or [[Falsidical paradox|falsidical]] paradoxes, antinomies cannot be resolved merely by guiding the intuition or by spotting an error in the reasoning; they expose tensions in the framework itself. Antinomic paradoxes have driven major developments in logic and philosophy by forcing reconsideration of foundational assumptions about truth, self-reference, and set membership. >[!example] Examples >- [[Barber's paradox]] >- [[Liar's paradox]] >- [[Russell's paradox]] >[!related] >- **North** (upstream): — >- **West** (similar): — >- **East** (different): [[Falsidical paradox]], [[Veridical paradox]] >- **South** (downstream): —