>[!abstract] >The consensus paradox refers to the idea that when agreement within a group appears too strong or unanimous, it can undermine the very reliability and value of that consensus. In such cases, social pressures, conformity, or fear of dissent may suppress alternative viewpoints, creating an illusion of certainty rather than genuine collective judgment. This dynamic risks [[groupthink]], reduces critical scrutiny, and can lock organizations or communities into flawed decisions. The paradox highlights that healthy consensus requires visible pluralism and constructive disagreement, not the elimination of dissent. >[!related] >- **North** (upstream): — >- **West** (similar): [[Echo chamber]], [[Groupthink]] >- **East** (different): [[Productive conflict]] >- **South** (downstream): [[Preference falsification]]